Powered by Blogger.
Home » » THM Forensics with volatility

THM Forensics with volatility

Written By Akademy on Monday, March 2, 2020 | 2:32 AM

Another day, another write-up on tryhackme challenge. Today, I going to show you a forensic challenge created by user whiteheart. This forensic challenge is a bit special when compared with the last CTF challenge. This challenge is about finding information inside a memory dump. For your information, there is a lot of forensic tools available on the Internet and volatility is one of the forensic tools that specialized in-memory analysis. The memory that I referred here is Random Access Memory (RAM) a.k.a volatile memory. An image of the volatile memory can hold various information that can help with an investigation. Information such as services, network activity, processes, user activity, and even password can be found within the image. For this instance, I am going to use the pre-installed volatility forensic tool inside the Kali Linux.

Task 1: Information gather

Task 1-1: Download the image file

First and foremost, download the image file before proceeding the challenge. The file size is about 438,371 KB. Most sure the unzipped image file match the given MD5 hash.

Task 1-2: Identify the OS

After that, launch your volatility help menu with the following command.
$ volatility -h
Scroll down the terminal and you will see tons of plugin commands. These commands are important as we are going to use it throughout the entire challenge. It is better if you roughly go through the commands and the description.
To perform the first scan on the memory image, we are going to use the following command.
$ volatility -f victim.raw imageinfo
After a jiff, the image’s information will be presented on your terminal. It seems that the victim is running on windows OS. However, we are unable to determine the exact Windows version where it can be either Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008. Either way, the result does not affect our next task.
Answer: windows

Task 1-3: Looking for ‘SearchIndexer’ PID

You can either use ‘pslist’ or ‘psscan’ to complete this task. The difference is pslist only lists out the running process while psscan scan and list out all the running and terminated process.
$ volatility -f victim.raw --profile=Win7SP1x64 pslist
$ volatility -f victim.raw --profile=Win7SP1x64 psscan
Answer: 2180

Task 1-4: Last accessed directory

‘Shellbags’ plugin command can be used to gather all the information about a viewed directory such as size, position, and icon. Using this command, we are able to track down the folder accessed by the user. Hence, it reduced the search time.
The ‘deleted_file’ is the last directory accessed by the user.
Answer: deleted_files

Task 2: Search for malicious processes

I am going to dig a little deeper on the memory image. This time we are going to look for the malicious processes running on the victim’s machine.

Task 2-1: Suspicious ports

By looking at the volatility help menu, you are supposedly able to scan the open port using ‘connections’ and ‘connscan’. However, both plugin commands only restricted to Windows XP and Windows server 2003. Luckily I found another way to scan the open ports using ‘netscan’ after reading this article. Let ‘s scan the open port using the following command
$ volatility -f victim.raw --profile=Win7SP1x64 netscan
After that, I summarized the scan in the table below.
PIDOpen portComment
4TCP:5357, TCP:445, UDP:138, UDP:137,TCP:2869System open port
1368UDP:59471, UDP:59471, UDP:3702, UDP:1900, UDP:61556, UDP:61555Suspicious
2464UDP:5005, UDP:5004, TCP:554Suspicious
Looks like PID 1368 and PID 2464 with multiple ports which look suspicious to us. How about the PPID of both processes?
Both processes are came from the same PPID. Definitely suspicious.
Answer: UDP:5005 (there are multiple answers for this task but the hint was saying the first one)

Task 2-2: Another suspicious process

We have identified PID 1368 and PID 2464 are malicious processes. There are other malicious processes still hiding inside the memory file which is yet to be discovered by us. How about revisiting the psscan?
The explorer.exe process is a suspicious process. This is because of the PPID of the explore.exe is nowhere to be found in the PID. Which process started the explorer.exe? The answer is unknown. However, this can not conclude that explorer.exe is a malicious process. How about we check for the process command line?
$ volatility -f victim.raw --profile=Win7SP1x64 cmdline
Look like the explorer.exe execute in the correct directory. How about dump the process and check with Virus total?
$ volatility -f victim.raw -p 1860 --profile=Win7SP1x64 procdump <Directory to save the file>
The file is clean on Virus total scan. Is this the end? Well, I don’t think so. There is another plugins command to check for the malware inside the memory file. The command named as ‘malfind’
$ volatility -f victim.raw --profile=Win7SP1x64 malfind
Now we are talking. The explorer.exe is executing protection which indicates the process is malicious. In the process of checking the malfind log, I stumble across PID 2464 which double confirm our previous finding. In addition, PID 1820 shows malicious sign. We are now identified four malicious PID which are 1368, 1464, 1860 and 1820.
Answer: 1860;1820;2464

Task 3: Indicators of compromise (IOC)

IOC are pieces of forensic data found inside the system entries log and files. This data is then used to identify malicious activity. Since we have identified all the malicious process on the previous task, we can dump the memory of to process to identify the malicious activity. We can dump the memory using the following command
$ volatility -f victim.raw -p <malicious PID> --profile=Win7SP1x64 memdump <Directory to save the file>
Out of 4 malicious dump files, we are only interested in 1820.dmp. This is because of the dump file answering all the questions in the following tasks.

Task 3-1: The first URL

With the given hint, you can easily obtain the answer using grep wildcard.
$ strings 1820.dmp | grep '\<www\.go....\.ru\>'
Answer: www.goporn.ru (DO not visit the site)

Task 3-2: The second URL

Similarly to the previous task.
$ strings 1820.dmp | grep '\<www\.i....\.com\>'
Answer: www.ikaka.com

Task 3-3: The third URL

Similarly to the task 3-1.
$ strings 1820.dmp | grep '\<www\.ic......\.com\>'
Answer: www.icsalabs.com

Task 3-4: The first IP address

I guess you know the way.
$ strings 1820.dmp | grep '\<202\....\.233\....\>'

Task 3-5: The second IP address

I don’t have to repeat it again.
$ strings 1820.dmp | grep '\<...\.200\...\.164\>'

Task 3-6: The third IP address

You know what to do.
$ strings 1820.dmp | grep '\<209\.190\....\....\>'

Task 3-7: The unique environment variable

To check with the environment variable from the memory image, you can use envars plugin command on PID 2464.
$ volatility -f victim.raw -p 2464 --profile=Win7SP1x64 envars
We found something extraordinary from the environment variable.


That’s all for the forensics challenge with volatility tools. In this forensic challenge, we learn how to extract information from the memory dump, analyse the malicious process and extracting domains from the dump file. Hope you enjoy the write-up. Until next time 😉
Share this article :


Trung Tâm Đào Tạo An Toàn Thông Tin Học Hacker Mũ Xám Online | Học An Ninh Mạng Trực Tuyến | CEH VIỆT NAM
Copyright © 2013. HACKER MŨ XÁM - All Rights Reserved
Web Master @ Võ Sĩ Máy Tính
Contact @ Đông Dương ICT